If evidence is Watkins priority, why does he fail to provide evidence against the people he has accused of defamation, becoming/are abusers, death threats, and a very long list of other accusations?
His daily rantings are based on nothing more than his opinion which is not evidence.
Justice Will Be Served can now provide the evidence that HG was sexually abused as a child
As this evidence contains many many pages, a direct link to the information will open in a new window.
The Hollie Greig Story - 20th July 2009 "In the summer of 2000, Hollie told her mother, Anne, that she had been repeatedly sexually abused by her father, Denis Charles Mackie and brother Greg. The abuse had begun when Hollie was just six years` old. Hollie said that Greg had also been abused by his father."
Aberdeen Paedophile Rape Ring Named At Public Meeting - 23th November 2009 "I will continue to pursue Ms Angiolini, Buchanan and others involved in this blatant Scottish Government and Crown Office cover up and conspiracy to defeat the ends of justice until the truth and justice prevails and justice is done ... and is seen to be done."
Paedophile Fiends In FerryHill - 30th December 2009 "I understand that this written warning has been circulating widely in Ferryhill and Aberdeen at large!"
Truthful Witness & Innocent Victim - 22nd April 2009 “Officers who have dealt with Hollie have taken the view she was a truthful witness to the best of her ability and an entirely innocent victim."
The Cover Up Begins - 13 March 2010 Hollie Greig & How it all came to light
Compensation - 17th November 2009 "It has been clearly stated by the authorities that Hollie Greig is an entirely credible and valid witness, a fact upheld and substantiated by the payment of 'Official Compensation'."
As you can see the evidence comes from Watkins himself, on his blog, posted by him and no other person which means he is solely responsible and held accountable for the content.
What this evidence above also means is fairly quite straightforward in that it clears everyone Watkins accused of publishing the names of the accused paedophiles and the named victims. It would appear that Mr Thomas George et al, was responsible for this disclosure, dated 23rd November 2009. Any mention of the Aberdeen paedophile ring before hand can not be found at this time, but if anyone can provide proof that it was, Justice will only be to happy to view the evidence and adjust this article accordingly.
Watkins has continued to claim that he published the names at the insistence of Robert Green and Anne Greig, trying to remove all accountability from himself. The sad fact remains, Stolen Kids is his blog, he published the material, which makes him solely accountable.
You will also note that Watkins has also amended the posts above after he was removed from the case by Anne Greig, at which point his vendetta truly began against anyone supporting HG and an onslaught of abuse to those who dare disagree with him.
It is only right to point out also that the people who support HG in her fight for justice on FaceBook groups, were not aware of HG until January 2010.
Justice also duly notes that Watkins has now changed the Stolen Kids signature from Hollie to Greg Lance-Watkins.
Justice also duly notes that if Watkins is adamant that HG was never abused, then why does he still tout all the information in his blog?
What They Are Trying To Suppress